ITALIAN CINEMA SERIES. FROM MUSSOLINI TO BERLUSCONI: A SET OF MASKS
13 January 2014 - 20 February 2014
The nine films of which the first 2014 CGAC cinema series is composed delve into twentieth century Italy. And in a most meticulous manner, they analyse the three political systems that dominated this long century: From the beginnings of the fascist movement in 1920 through 2013, just after the period of mediocracy known as Berlusconism finally came to a close. (We are talking about two buffoons here, Mussolini and Berlusconi, who are unlike any other in terms of their historical, geostrategic and war impact. However, they are indeed worthy of comparison in their ability to build demagogic regimes, in their use of mass media, in their basest instincts for garnering popular support, and in the length of time that both were able to prolong their leadership).
Somewhere in the middle of Girolimoni, il mostro di Roma, Benito Mussolini appears on the scene. When the actions of a rapist and child murderer causes mass hysteria in a town that Mussolini has recently taken in his march on Rome, he is forced into accountability sooner rather than later and must find a scapegoat for the people. The somatisation of fascism through the murder of children is more obvious here than in Fritz Lang´s M, The Vampire of Düsseldorf. This illness opts to take root in the physical presence of Il Duce at his peak.
Mussolini does not reappear in this series, although his shadow lurks in two other films in such a way that the not so distant foreground conveys his downfall. La lunga notte del 43 and in Salò o les 120 giornate di Sodoma portrays the days of exacerbated chaos, violence, and repression stemming from the Axis defeats. With a formidable dramatic eloquence, Vancini´s film reconstructs the massacre of Ferrara´s civilians prior to Mussolini´s fall from power. As for Pasolini, he found material for his film—one that was involuntarily testamentary—in the frenzied escape from the so-called Republic of Salò when, having lost the war, a group of fascist resistors engage in the ritualization of sex and death. As the newly resumed research progresses on Pasolini´s political assassination, a popular theory has emerged that the kidnapping of the original Salomites served as bait for drawing the filmmaker and intellectual into a fatal trap, signalling one of the peaks of the strategy of tension and the years of lead of Italy in the nineteen-seventies.
The other two peaks during this decade of collective tremors were the assassination of Aldo Moro and the Piazza Fontana slaughter, an attack spearheaded by the extreme right group Ordine Nuovo in Milan in 1969. Romanzo di una strage, for some incomprehensible reason previously unreleased in Spain, recreates—using the knowledge we now have today of the event—the pinnacle of the strategy that would culminate in a neofascist coup d´état led by Borghese, ´The Black Prince.´ Then there is Marco Tullio Giordana, whose only film to reach Spain is La meglio gioventú, a political drama that, while less convoluted than the canonical model of this genre (that of Francesco Rossi and Elio Petri), is undoubtedly inspired by it. In one sweeping step, it takes the viewer through a broken and backward Italy where the iconic Aldo Moro, mentioned previously, makes an appearance.
At the same time that all of this was shaking the very foundation of the country, a certain segment of the leftist intellectual population was already operating far outside the system, away from politics and their official nature, in harmony with the praises of Jean-Paul Sartre or—directly from the realm of film—Jean-Luc Godard. Dominated by Godard´s looming presence during those years, Bernardo Bertolucci is no longer the homegrown communist he was in Prima della rivoluzione but, rather, a supporter of the counterculture protest. Partner, with its declared support of Viet Cong, direct action, and delegitimation of power is one of the most revealing symbols of 1968 cinema, not just in Italy but internationally.
Beneath the guise of a scenic game—that is, the portrayal of a Dostoyevsky theatrical production—Bertolucci conducts an exercise in schizophrenic vividness, with Pierre Clementi embodying the Jekyll and Hyde nature of the tumultuous left. When so much has already been said about the kidnappings and prohibitions of Last Tango in Paris, perhaps the time has come to hone in on Bertolucci´s least famous work. We must ask ourselves what the political motives were for preventing this film from premiering in the United States and Mexico (two of the hotbeds of the 1968 uprisings) until 1974 and 1976, respectively, or why its release in England, for example, was never authorised. Perhaps, for the sake of that out-of-date element that was once known as intellectual curiosity, perhaps it is worth it to discover Partner, nearly fifty years later.
We started off talking about Mussolini and Berlusconi. What both of them shared—the First Italian Republic, from 1945 until its implosion in 1992—had a lifelong Cerberus: When Paolo Sorrentino dared to narrate Giulio Andreotti´s vital and unforeseen turn of events (that is, politics; for him it was always politics), it did not seem possible that this biopic could cover all of the twists and turns, nooks and crannies, shadows and unpleasantries from which he always managed to come out unscathed as the guardian of secrets. This is Andreotti. Perhaps this is where the brilliant, visionary, dramatic idea came from for Il Divo, to foreshadow with great dexterity what was to come. Thus, Toni Servillo, a real star under Sorrentino´s direction (since La grande bellezza has risen to the top, this series will conclude with a film by the same director and starring the same actor, Le conseguenze dell´amore) takes on the likeness of an anthropomorphic rodent that seems to represent, better than any other attempt, the true nature of Beelzebub: Prime Minister seven times over and mastermind of all the conspiracies of his time, from Operation Gladio, oil tycoon Enrico Mattei´s forced landing and Valerio Borghese´s coup d´état to pacts with the mafia, the controlled assassination of Magistrates Falcone and Borsellino, and the poisoning of Pope John Paul I. And all of this ends with a kiss of death from Toto Riina in Palermo. Like Al Capone, only a fiscal offense could stop him.
And, having ousted Andreotti, Il Divo, and with the Republic buried under the ominous name of Tangentopoli, we finally arrive at Silvio Berlusconi. It is not important whether he played a part in any of the above, or if his fortune was amassed under the protection of the Pentapartito and Bettino Craxi. Either way, Berlusconi emerged from the labyrinth. Perhaps on account of having suffered so greatly due to the relatively short reach of a film/demolition of Il Cavaliere, centered around a farce, an impossible characterisation of a caricature, where the imitator always loses to the original version (see Sabina Guzanti and her headstrong Viva Zapatero), Nanni Moretti was cold and calculating in his approach toward the indestructible buffoon. Il Caimano is one of my favourite political films of all time and one that was created amidst the anguish of dealing with a power junkie while he is actually still in power. That is to say that everything that is typical about these dangerous assumptions—making a film of such an urgent nature, carefully amassing an arsenal of explosives to combat the rampant despot, and the recurrence, sooner or later, of melodramatic means or militant sentimentalisms—is precisely what Nanni Moretti avoids like the plague in his 2006 film.
Creating this film was a complex and minutely calculated task of distancing, beginning with the concept of Russian dolls, where there is a film contained within a film: a movie that speaks about another movie that will speak about Berlusconi. Everything that happens seems not to be connected to Il Caimano. Yet the film is impossible. Only Berlusconi himself could create a believable Berlusconi character. Therefore, the two sequences in which archival material is used so that the person speaking is, in fact, Il Cavaliere, without any intermediaries, are akin to the Mephistophelian horror genre. Only Nanni Moretti, who has been lying in wait for the magnificent and abrupt end of Italy´s masquerade, can make Berlusconi palatable, cantering between outbursts in this tremendous work of art on power without power. On this journey, an Italy reddened with a century of blood and fire is left behind as if it were the Vietnam of the napalm pacifists.
Information Leaflet
DIRECTOR: José Luis Losa
SCREENING PROGRAM
Somewhere in the middle of Girolimoni, il mostro di Roma, Benito Mussolini appears on the scene. When the actions of a rapist and child murderer causes mass hysteria in a town that Mussolini has recently taken in his march on Rome, he is forced into accountability sooner rather than later and must find a scapegoat for the people. The somatisation of fascism through the murder of children is more obvious here than in Fritz Lang´s M, The Vampire of Düsseldorf. This illness opts to take root in the physical presence of Il Duce at his peak.
Mussolini does not reappear in this series, although his shadow lurks in two other films in such a way that the not so distant foreground conveys his downfall. La lunga notte del 43 and in Salò o les 120 giornate di Sodoma portrays the days of exacerbated chaos, violence, and repression stemming from the Axis defeats. With a formidable dramatic eloquence, Vancini´s film reconstructs the massacre of Ferrara´s civilians prior to Mussolini´s fall from power. As for Pasolini, he found material for his film—one that was involuntarily testamentary—in the frenzied escape from the so-called Republic of Salò when, having lost the war, a group of fascist resistors engage in the ritualization of sex and death. As the newly resumed research progresses on Pasolini´s political assassination, a popular theory has emerged that the kidnapping of the original Salomites served as bait for drawing the filmmaker and intellectual into a fatal trap, signalling one of the peaks of the strategy of tension and the years of lead of Italy in the nineteen-seventies.
The other two peaks during this decade of collective tremors were the assassination of Aldo Moro and the Piazza Fontana slaughter, an attack spearheaded by the extreme right group Ordine Nuovo in Milan in 1969. Romanzo di una strage, for some incomprehensible reason previously unreleased in Spain, recreates—using the knowledge we now have today of the event—the pinnacle of the strategy that would culminate in a neofascist coup d´état led by Borghese, ´The Black Prince.´ Then there is Marco Tullio Giordana, whose only film to reach Spain is La meglio gioventú, a political drama that, while less convoluted than the canonical model of this genre (that of Francesco Rossi and Elio Petri), is undoubtedly inspired by it. In one sweeping step, it takes the viewer through a broken and backward Italy where the iconic Aldo Moro, mentioned previously, makes an appearance.
At the same time that all of this was shaking the very foundation of the country, a certain segment of the leftist intellectual population was already operating far outside the system, away from politics and their official nature, in harmony with the praises of Jean-Paul Sartre or—directly from the realm of film—Jean-Luc Godard. Dominated by Godard´s looming presence during those years, Bernardo Bertolucci is no longer the homegrown communist he was in Prima della rivoluzione but, rather, a supporter of the counterculture protest. Partner, with its declared support of Viet Cong, direct action, and delegitimation of power is one of the most revealing symbols of 1968 cinema, not just in Italy but internationally.
Beneath the guise of a scenic game—that is, the portrayal of a Dostoyevsky theatrical production—Bertolucci conducts an exercise in schizophrenic vividness, with Pierre Clementi embodying the Jekyll and Hyde nature of the tumultuous left. When so much has already been said about the kidnappings and prohibitions of Last Tango in Paris, perhaps the time has come to hone in on Bertolucci´s least famous work. We must ask ourselves what the political motives were for preventing this film from premiering in the United States and Mexico (two of the hotbeds of the 1968 uprisings) until 1974 and 1976, respectively, or why its release in England, for example, was never authorised. Perhaps, for the sake of that out-of-date element that was once known as intellectual curiosity, perhaps it is worth it to discover Partner, nearly fifty years later.
We started off talking about Mussolini and Berlusconi. What both of them shared—the First Italian Republic, from 1945 until its implosion in 1992—had a lifelong Cerberus: When Paolo Sorrentino dared to narrate Giulio Andreotti´s vital and unforeseen turn of events (that is, politics; for him it was always politics), it did not seem possible that this biopic could cover all of the twists and turns, nooks and crannies, shadows and unpleasantries from which he always managed to come out unscathed as the guardian of secrets. This is Andreotti. Perhaps this is where the brilliant, visionary, dramatic idea came from for Il Divo, to foreshadow with great dexterity what was to come. Thus, Toni Servillo, a real star under Sorrentino´s direction (since La grande bellezza has risen to the top, this series will conclude with a film by the same director and starring the same actor, Le conseguenze dell´amore) takes on the likeness of an anthropomorphic rodent that seems to represent, better than any other attempt, the true nature of Beelzebub: Prime Minister seven times over and mastermind of all the conspiracies of his time, from Operation Gladio, oil tycoon Enrico Mattei´s forced landing and Valerio Borghese´s coup d´état to pacts with the mafia, the controlled assassination of Magistrates Falcone and Borsellino, and the poisoning of Pope John Paul I. And all of this ends with a kiss of death from Toto Riina in Palermo. Like Al Capone, only a fiscal offense could stop him.
And, having ousted Andreotti, Il Divo, and with the Republic buried under the ominous name of Tangentopoli, we finally arrive at Silvio Berlusconi. It is not important whether he played a part in any of the above, or if his fortune was amassed under the protection of the Pentapartito and Bettino Craxi. Either way, Berlusconi emerged from the labyrinth. Perhaps on account of having suffered so greatly due to the relatively short reach of a film/demolition of Il Cavaliere, centered around a farce, an impossible characterisation of a caricature, where the imitator always loses to the original version (see Sabina Guzanti and her headstrong Viva Zapatero), Nanni Moretti was cold and calculating in his approach toward the indestructible buffoon. Il Caimano is one of my favourite political films of all time and one that was created amidst the anguish of dealing with a power junkie while he is actually still in power. That is to say that everything that is typical about these dangerous assumptions—making a film of such an urgent nature, carefully amassing an arsenal of explosives to combat the rampant despot, and the recurrence, sooner or later, of melodramatic means or militant sentimentalisms—is precisely what Nanni Moretti avoids like the plague in his 2006 film.
Creating this film was a complex and minutely calculated task of distancing, beginning with the concept of Russian dolls, where there is a film contained within a film: a movie that speaks about another movie that will speak about Berlusconi. Everything that happens seems not to be connected to Il Caimano. Yet the film is impossible. Only Berlusconi himself could create a believable Berlusconi character. Therefore, the two sequences in which archival material is used so that the person speaking is, in fact, Il Cavaliere, without any intermediaries, are akin to the Mephistophelian horror genre. Only Nanni Moretti, who has been lying in wait for the magnificent and abrupt end of Italy´s masquerade, can make Berlusconi palatable, cantering between outbursts in this tremendous work of art on power without power. On this journey, an Italy reddened with a century of blood and fire is left behind as if it were the Vietnam of the napalm pacifists.
Information Leaflet
DIRECTOR: José Luis Losa
SCREENING PROGRAM
16 January: Presentation by José Luis Losa. La dolce vita (Federico Fellini, 1960)
17 January: Girolimoni, il mostro di Roma (Damiano Damiani, 1972)
23 January: La lunga notte del 43 (Florestano Vancini, 1960)
24 January: Partner (Bernardo Bertolucci, 1968)
30 January: Romanzo di una strange (Marco Tulio Giordana, 2012)
31 January: Il Divo (Paolo Sorrentino, 2008)
6 February: Il Caimano (Nanni Moretti, 2006)
7 February: Le conseguenze dell´amore (Paolo Sorrentino, 2004)
20 February: Closing lecture by Javier Rebollo. Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma (Pier Paolo Pasolini, 1975)
All screenings will begin at 8:30 p.m. Entrance is free until filled to capacity.
